Property crimes in California range from low-level misdemeanor theft cases to serious violent felonies carrying strike exposure.
Theft, Burglary, Robbery & Property Crimes in California
The core governing statutes include:
Petty Theft (general definition)
Penal Code §488
Petty theft
Grand theft
Petty theft threshold (value over/under $950)
Petty theft with prior convictions
Burglary
First- and second-degree burglary
Robbery
The difference between these offenses turns on value, intent, entry, force, and prior record.
Theft Under Penal Code §484
California defines theft broadly. Theft can occur through:
- Larceny (taking property)
- Embezzlement
- False pretenses
- Trick or fraud
The prosecution must prove:
- Property belonged to someone else,
- It was taken or appropriated without consent,
- With intent to permanently deprive the owner of it.
Intent is often the central issue.
Petty Theft – Penal Code §§488 & 490.2
Under Penal Code §490.2, theft of property valued at $950 or less is generally charged as misdemeanor petty theft.
Penalty:
- Up to 6 months in county jail
- Fine
- Probation
California’s reforms (including Proposition 47) shifted many theft cases into the misdemeanor category. However, prior convictions can significantly alter exposure.
Petty Theft With a Prior – Penal Code §666
Under Penal Code §666, petty theft can be elevated if the defendant has certain prior theft-related convictions and served custody.
Historically, this statute allowed routine felony filings. Modern reforms significantly narrowed when felony treatment applies.
Today, felony exposure under §666 typically requires:
- Specific qualifying prior convictions
- Prior incarceration
- Compliance with statutory conditions
Even where eligible, these cases are heavily litigated.
Penalty (if charged as felony):
- 16 months, 2 years, or 3 years
Grand Theft – Penal Code §487
Grand theft applies when:
- Property exceeds $950 in value, or
- Certain categories of property are involved (firearms, vehicles, agricultural products)
Grand theft is a “wobbler”:
- Misdemeanor or felony
- Felony exposure: 16 months, 2 years, or 3 years
Value disputes are central in many grand theft cases.
Burglary – Penal Code §459
Burglary is often misunderstood.
Burglary does not require theft to occur.
It requires entry into a structure with intent to commit theft or any felony.
First-Degree Burglary – Penal Code §460(a)
Applies to:
- Entry into an inhabited dwelling
This is always a felony and a strike offense.
Penalty:
- 2, 4, or 6 years in state prison
Intent at the time of entry is the key battleground.
Second-Degree Burglary – Penal Code §460(b)
Applies to:
- Commercial buildings
- Uninhabited structures
This is typically a wobbler (can be charged as either a felony or a misdemeanor)
Robbery – Penal Code §211
Robbery is theft accomplished by:
- Force, or
- Fear
Unlike burglary or theft, robbery is a violent felony and a strike offense.
Penalty (second-degree robbery):
- 2, 3, or 5 years
First-degree robbery (residential or certain victim categories):
- 3, 4, or 6 years
Enhancements can dramatically increase exposure (e.g., weapon use, great bodily injury).
The Real Differences Between Theft, Burglary, and Robbery
- Theft → Taking property.
- Burglary → Entry with intent to commit theft or a felony.
- Robbery → Taking property through force or fear (think of a “mugging”)
The escalation is significant:
- Theft = property crime
- Burglary = intent at entry
- Robbery = violent felony
The Impact of Prior Convictions
Prior convictions affect:
- Filing decisions
- Eligibility for diversion
- Bail
- Sentencing exposure
- Strike consequences
Petty theft cases can become far more serious when priors are involved, especially under §666.
Common Defense Issues in Property Crime Cases
- Valuation disputes
- Lack of intent
- Mistaken identity
- Surveillance reliability
- Self-checkout and “intent vs. confusion” issues
- Consent or ownership disputes
- Overcharging burglary where intent is speculative
- Force element challenges in robbery cases
Early review of surveillance footage is often critical. Retail video is routinely overwritten within weeks.
Collateral Consequences
Property crime convictions can impact:
- Immigration status
- Professional licenses
- Employment background checks
- Strike exposure (in robbery and certain burglary cases)
- Probation search conditions
Why Acting Early Matters
Property crimes often hinge on:
- Surveillance footage
- Loss prevention reports
- Digital payment records
- Intent inference
Waiting weakens the ability to:
- Preserve video
- Identify witnesses
- Challenge valuation
- Prevent enhancement overreach
In burglary and robbery cases especially, early strategy can determine how a case is charged and whether a case remains a misdemeanor or escalates to a strike felony.
Next Step
If you or a family member is facing theft, burglary, robbery, or property crime charges under Penal Code §§484, 487, 490.2, 666, 459, or 211 in California — and you want a defense review focused on the specific statute(s) filed, prior-conviction exposure, valuation issues, and potential strike consequences — you can send your information to me here:
Featured Content
The Lifecycle of a Criminal Case
Criminal Defense Overview
A California criminal case does not move in one straight line. Cases begin with an investigation or arrest, but many never reach trial. Some are rejected before filing. Some resolve at arraignment. Some felony cases are narrowed or dismissed at the preliminary hearing. Others proceed all the way through jury trial.
Still, there is a classic path. If you understand that path, it becomes much easier to understand what is happening in your own case and why timing, charging decisions, and defense strategy matter so much for the fate of a case.
This page is my attempt to illustrate the usual lifecycle of a California criminal case from arrest through jury trial and to highlight the major differences between misdemeanor and felony procedure.
morePreliminary Hearing in California
A preliminary hearing (often called a “prelim”) is a court proceeding in felony cases where a judge determines whether there is enough evidence to require the defendant to stand trial.
It is not a trial. It is a screening mechanism to weed out baseless charges or narrow the scope of a future jury trial.
moreAssault and Battery Charges in California
Assault and battery cases range from minor altercations to serious felony allegations carrying strike exposure. The difference between a misdemeanor and a prison case often turns on injury level, weapon use, and how the incident is framed in the first police report.
moreCalifornia Gun & Firearm Laws: The Big Picture (and the Charges People Actually Get Filed With)
California treats firearm cases as high-stakes, high-leverage prosecutions. Even when there’s no allegation the gun was fired, prosecutors routinely file gun charges to (1) increase exposure, (2) trigger custody, and (3) force unfavorable plea pressure. The statutes are also technical—people get charged for paperwork, configuration, location, or status issues, not just “having a gun.”
This page lays out how California gun laws work at a practical level, what’s most commonly charged, and what those charges typically turn on.
(Note: The Supreme Court of the United States has recently submitted new opinions on the validity of certain gun laws; at least two of those opinions affect California laws and are being evaluated and are currently being reviewed under appeal)
more



